How to use this website
Home

Wichita State dashboard handbook

What every figure measures, how it is computed, where it comes from, why it matters and how to read it. The current reading of each figure is taken from the site when it is built (2026-10-20).

52 entries

How to use this dashboard

What the site covers, how its pages fit together, and the controls every tile shares.

What the dashboard covers

What it measures
Wichita State University’s budget, faculty and staff positions, pay, courses, tuition and fees, and comparisons with peer universities, from public documents.
How it is computed
Each figure is extracted from a published source (budget books, payroll, class schedule, Board of Regents and federal reports), checked against the source, and recomputed by an automated audit before every release.
Source and years
See Data sources at the end of this handbook.
Why it matters
One place where faculty, staff, students and the public can see how money and people have moved, with every number traceable to a document.
How to read it
Start with the three Key trends on the Overview page, then open a topic tab or a report (Budget, Employees, Pay, Peers, KBOR stats, Courses) or a college page.
What it does not show
Budgeted amounts are plans, not spending, unless a figure says actual or audited. The site is independent and not affiliated with Wichita State University.

Where: Overview

Tiles, periods and labels

What it measures
Every finding is a tile with a period badge (the years compared), a headline, the figure, a one-line qualifier and plain-fact labels.
How it is computed
Labels are set from the figures (for example “Below inflation” when the change after inflation is negative); there are no judgement words such as good or bad.
Source and years
All pages.
Why it matters
The period beside every percentage keeps comparisons honest: a change over five years is not a change over one.
How to read it
“Definitions & sources” opens what is counted, the kind of figure, the period and the limits. “View analysis” opens the full tables. “Discussion” holds context notes from readers and the Budget Office.
What it does not show
A tile summarises; the analysis window and the report page hold the detail.

Where: Overview

Charts and tables

What it measures
Line and column charts by year, paired bars, index charts and tables with a best / weakest mark.
How it is computed
Index charts start every series at 100 in the first year so lines of different sizes can be compared by growth; tables mark the best value with ✓ (green) and the weakest with ✗ (red) where a direction is meaningful; † marks a group of fewer than five people.
Source and years
All pages.
Why it matters
Growth comparisons (administration against instruction, Wichita State against peers) are clearer as an index than as dollars.
How to read it
Hover or tap a point for its value; click a column heading to sort a table; Maximize opens a pop-up full screen; Reset all filters returns every filter to its default (the latest year).
What it does not show
An index shows growth, not size: a small line can grow fast.

Where: Budget report · A college page

Budget

Where the budgeted money goes, by program and by division, and how it changed. Budget books FY23–FY27 unless stated.

General Use and All funds

What it measures
Two views of every budget line. General Use = tuition plus the state’s general operating allocation, the money the university decides how to spend. All funds adds restricted money (grants, contracts, gifts, auxiliary and research funds).
How it is computed
Both columns are printed in each budget book’s summary tables; shares are of that year’s total in the same view.
Source and years
WSU Annual Operating Budget books, FY23–FY27 (FY26 = adopted revised edition).
Why it matters
General Use shows choices; All funds shows scale. NIAR’s research contracts make All funds grow far faster than General Use.
How to read it
Compare a line’s share of General Use across years to see its priority; compare dollars for size.
What it does not show
Budgeted, not spent. Units the book moves between programs or divisions change shares without changing spending.

Where: Budget report

Instruction’s share of the budget

Current readingInstruction’s budget share fell: FY23 34.0% → FY27 27.5% (FY23–FY27) — Instruction’s share of the budget fell every year, FY23–FY27

What it measures
The Instruction program (faculty and instructional staff salaries and teaching costs) as a share of the General Use budget.
How it is computed
Instruction’s General Use dollars ÷ total General Use, each year, from the book’s Budget by Program table. A highlighted “Without NIAR” view repeats it without the NIAR research unit.
Source and years
Budget books FY23–FY27.
Why it matters
The share of money that reaches teaching is the most direct budget measure of academic priority.
How to read it
A falling share means other programs grew faster, even if Instruction dollars held.
What it does not show
Program coding is the university’s own; new Instruction lines appear in later books (noted under By program).

Where: Budget report · Overview, Budget tab

Division shares (Academic Affairs, Finance & Administration)

Current readingAcademic Affairs’ budget share fell: FY23 50.6% → FY27 42.5% (FY23–FY27); Finance & Administration’s share rose: FY23 31.1% → FY27 36.0% (FY23–FY27)

What it measures
Each division’s share of the General Use budget: Academic Affairs, Finance & Administration, President’s Office, Student Affairs, Industry & Defense Programs, Research.
How it is computed
Division totals from the book’s Budget by Division table ÷ the General Use total; unit-level detail from Table V.
Source and years
Budget books FY23–FY27, Table V.
Why it matters
Shows whether the academic side or the administrative side gained budget share.
How to read it
Open View analysis for the units inside each division and their change.
What it does not show
Units moved between divisions (for example in FY24) shift shares; the analysis names them.

Where: Budget report

Academic Affairs, latest year

Current readingAcademic Affairs General Use fell $4.8M in one year: FY26 $97.8M → FY27 $93.0M ▼ −4.9% (FY26–FY27)

What it measures
The one-year change in Academic Affairs’ General Use budget, with its units.
How it is computed
FY26 against FY27 division totals and unit lines (Table V); the book’s own “Academic Affairs Reallocation” and its share of the FY27 recurring reductions.
Source and years
Budget books FY26 and FY27.
Why it matters
The most recent budget decision, ahead of long-run trends.
How to read it
The units table lists the largest reductions first.
What it does not show
Budgeted; a unit moved between divisions changes a total without changing spending.

Where: Overview, Budget tab

Central administration (Institutional Support)

Current readingCentral administration grew by nearly a third: FY23 $20.4M → FY27 $26.7M ▲ +31% (FY23–FY27)

What it measures
The Institutional Support program: executive management, fiscal operations, general administration, public relations and development.
How it is computed
General Use dollars from the Budget by Program table, FY23 against FY27.
Source and years
Budget books.
Why it matters
The standard national category for central administration, comparable across universities (the KBOR and IPEDS pages use the same category).
How to read it
Compare its growth with Instruction’s.
What it does not show
Includes reserves and contingencies some years (see Administration and Instruction pay).

Where: Budget report

Revenue and enrollment

Current readingMore money, fewer degree-seeking students: FY23 $163.8M → FY27 $180.3M ▲ +10.1% (FY23–FY27) — Tuition and state funding rose while degree-seeking enrollment fell, FY23–FY27

What it measures
Tuition income plus the state’s General Operating allocation (the two sources of General Use money) against degree-seeking enrollment.
How it is computed
Budgeted tuition and allocation FY23–FY27, each fiscal year matched with the fall census that opens it (Fall 2022 for FY23 … Fall 2026 for FY27).
Source and years
Budget books; WSU Fall Census (factbook PDF to Fall 2025, 10-year workbook for Fall 2026).
Why it matters
More money with fewer students means more money per student; the question is where it goes.
How to read it
Degree-seeking = total headcount minus non-degree students (high-school and college guests, open admission).
What it does not show
Budgeted revenue, not receipts; not inflation-adjusted.

Where: Budget report

Athletics

Current readingAthletics budget nearly quadrupled: FY23 $3.6M → FY27 $13.9M ▲ +288% (FY23–FY27)

What it measures
The Intercollegiate Athletics line, all funds and General Use.
How it is computed
The division table’s Intercollegiate Athletics line, FY23–FY27.
Source and years
Budget books.
Why it matters
A visible use of institutional money outside teaching and research.
How to read it
The General Use operating line first appears in the adopted FY26 book.
What it does not show
Budgeted; athletics also has its own revenues.

Where: Budget report

Audited spending (actual, not budget)

Current readingActual spending: instruction’s share fell: FY19 23.9% → FY25 14.7% Without research: 30.9% → 28.2% (FY19–FY25) — Audited spending nearly doubled, FY19–FY25; instruction rose 22%

What it measures
What the university actually spent, by function, and where its money came from.
How it is computed
Operating expenses by function from the audited Annual Financial Reports, FY19–FY25; budget against actual where both exist.
Source and years
WSU Annual Financial Reports (audited), FY19–FY25.
Why it matters
Checks the budget story against what happened.
How to read it
Instruction’s share is shown with and without research (NIAR is most of research).
What it does not show
Accrual accounting and federal functional categories differ from the budget books; university only (the foundation is not included).

Where: Budget report

Regional comparison of instruction budgets

Current readingInstruction budget declined: FY24 $99.1M → FY27 $96.6M ▼ −2.5% (FY24–FY27)

What it measures
Wichita State’s instruction line against five other universities in the region, each university’s own teaching line.
How it is computed
Each school’s published budget line FY24 onward; direction only.
Source and years
Each university’s published budget.
Why it matters
Shows whether the direction at Wichita State is shared by neighbours.
How to read it
Compare direction, not size: the bases differ.
What it does not show
Not WSU’s official peer list; lines are defined differently.

Where: Peers report

Tuition, fees and reserves

What students are charged beyond tuition, and the tuition reserve.

Program fees

Current readingProgram fees rose a typical 33% since FY22: +33% typical change Largest: Medical Laboratory Sciences $106.87 → $250 (+134%) (FY22–FY27)

What it measures
Fees charged to a program’s own students (nursing, physical therapy, physician associate, dental hygiene, medical laboratory sciences, social work and others).
How it is computed
Approved rates each year; the typical (median) change since FY22, and the largest.
Source and years
Kansas Board of Regents (KBOR) comprehensive fee schedules FY18–FY27.
Why it matters
Program fees add to the cost of particular degrees on top of tuition.
How to read it
Compare with resident tuition’s change over the same years.
What it does not show
Approved rates, not amounts collected; not inflation-adjusted.

Where: Budget report

College course fees and new fees

Current readingCollege course fees rose up to 25% since FY22: FY22 $20 → FY27 $25 ▲ +25% (FY22–FY27); Five fees added since FY22: 5 new fees (FY22–FY27)

What it measures
Per-credit-hour fees on every course of a college (Business, Engineering, Fine Arts, Liberal Arts & Sciences, Education by department), and fees created since FY22.
How it is computed
Approved rates by year; a fee is new when it first appears in a schedule.
Source and years
KBOR fee schedules; WSU’s own fee tables in its tuition proposals (FY20–FY27).
Why it matters
Course fees are paid by everyone who takes the college’s courses.
How to read it
The college page’s fee tiles compare the approved rates with WSU’s own fee tables.
What it does not show
Rates only.

Where: Budget report

Tuition carry-forward

Current readingTuition carry-forward peaked, then fell: FY23 $24.1M → FY25 $9.2M ▼ −62% (FY18–FY25); Tuition spending outpaced revenue: FY22 $83.9M → FY25 $104.7M ▲ +24.7% (FY22–FY25)

What it measures
The balance of the tuition fund (General Fees Fund) at year end, and tuition spent against tuition collected.
How it is computed
From WSU’s filings to the Board of Regents (Appendix F-2 of the tuition proposals), FY18–FY27 (estimates and projections marked).
Source and years
KBOR tuition and fee proposals.
Why it matters
A reserve that grows and then is drawn down shows tuition money being saved and spent.
How to read it
The six-university chart puts the balance as a share of each university’s tuition revenue.
What it does not show
As filed; the filings do not say what the reserve paid for.

Where: Carry-forward page

Carry-forward against the state universities

Current readingCarry-forward vs. state universities: 9.8% of tuition revenue (FY25)

What it measures
Each Kansas state university’s tuition balance as a share of its tuition revenue.
How it is computed
Same filings for all six.
Source and years
KBOR tuition proposals.
Why it matters
Puts Wichita State’s reserve in context.
How to read it
Higher = more tuition held in reserve.
What it does not show
KU and K-State are their main campuses.

Where: Carry-forward page

Teaching and courses

Classes offered, class size, credit hours and how classes are taught. The six colleges, 20-21 to 25-26 (26-27 is Fall 2026 only).

Classes offered and class size

Current readingFewer, larger classes: Sections −2.6% Student credit hours +7.5% average class 22.5 → 25.3 students (AY 20-21 to 25-26)

What it measures
Sections offered (classes of 2 or more credits with students) and the average number of students per class.
How it is computed
From WSU’s public class schedule each term; cross-listed and split sections counted once; empty sections, independent study, theses, internships and practica left out.
Source and years
WSU class schedule (Banner), Spring 2020–Fall 2026.
Why it matters
Fewer, larger classes mean less individual attention and fewer choices; more credit hours through fewer sections is the efficiency side.
How to read it
Read sections together with student credit hours.
What it does not show
Averages hide the spread between seminars and lectures.

Where: Courses report · Overview, Teaching tab

Colleges compared

Current readingColleges changed unevenly: Barton, average class +27% Liberal Arts & Sciences, sections −10.1% (AY 20-21 to 25-26)

What it measures
Each college’s change in sections offered, average class size and student credit hours.
How it is computed
Same class rules as above, by college.
Source and years
Class schedule.
Why it matters
The university average can hide one college growing and another shrinking.
How to read it
The ✓ / ✗ marks show the best and weakest college in each column.
What it does not show
Good class size differs by subject.

Where: Overview, Teaching tab · College pages

Student credit hours and seats filled

What it measures
Student credit hours (students × credits) and the share of offered seats that were filled.
How it is computed
Every class’s credits × enrollment; seats = enrollment ÷ capacity.
Source and years
Class schedule.
Why it matters
Credit hours are teaching volume and drive tuition revenue; seats filled shows unused capacity.
How to read it
Credit hours up with sections down = more students per class.
What it does not show
Capacity is the scheduled cap, not the room size.

Where: College page, Key trends

Face-to-face share

Current reading53% of classes meet face to face (F2F): 24-25 54.5% → 25-26 53.0% (AY 24-25 to 25-26)

What it measures
The share of classes taught fully in person (versus online or hybrid).
How it is computed
Banner’s instruction-mode code per class.
Source and years
Class schedule.
Why it matters
How students learn and how much time they spend with faculty.
How to read it
Comparable from 24-25 only: Banner changed its delivery codes in Spring 2024.
What it does not show
Labelled when under 60%.

Where: Courses report

Student outcomes: retention and graduation

Current readingRetention lowest of six; graduation up: Fall 2019 75.7% → Fall 2024 71.7% −4.0 points; median of the other five −1.0 (Fall 2019–Fall 2024)

What it measures
First-year retention (first-time, full-time freshmen still enrolled a year later) and four- and six-year graduation rates, against the five other Kansas state universities.
How it is computed
KBOR Data Book Tables 3.7 and 3.8.
Source and years
KBOR State University Data Book, 2026 edition.
Why it matters
The outcome measures that matter most to students and to funding.
How to read it
Rank 1 = highest of six.
What it does not show
First-time, full-time students only; each university reports its own cohort.

Where: KBOR stats

Teaching load per person

What it measures
Classes and credit hours each faculty member taught per term, against the college’s normal load and average for the same series.
How it is computed
Class schedule names matched to budget-book names; release time and roles noted.
Source and years
Class schedule; budget books; college workload policies.
Why it matters
Shows who carries the teaching.
How to read it
Open a person in the Faculty-level table; the charts sit under the year table.
What it does not show
Names the schedule spells differently are linked by an alias list.

Where: College page, person panel

Faculty

Who is on the faculty and how that changed. Faculty = a tenure-track or non-tenure-track budget line above 0.50 FTE.

Tenure-track and non-tenure-track faculty

Current readingTenure-track faculty declined: FY22 360 → FY27 316 ▼ −12% (FY22–FY27) — WSU has 44 fewer tenure-track faculty than in FY22, and 70 more non-tenure-track

What it measures
Filled faculty positions in the six colleges by track.
How it is computed
Named budget lines above 0.50 FTE; chairs and school directors counted at their rank; deans and associate/assistant deans left out; FY27 adds faculty hired after the book (from department web pages) and removes owner-confirmed departures.
Source and years
Budget books FY19–FY27; department web pages.
Why it matters
Tenure-track faculty carry research, graduate supervision and the long-term curriculum.
How to read it
The college page shows the same by department.
What it does not show
Positions, not people’s time; a 0.75 FTE line counts as one.

Where: Employees report · Overview, Faculty & Pay tab

One-year change in tenure-track faculty

Current readingTenure-track faculty fell by 13 in one year: 43 no longer counted → 30 newly counted ▼ net −13 (FY26 → FY27)

What it measures
Who left the tenure-track count between FY26 and FY27 and who joined.
How it is computed
Leavers by kind (left, retirement payout, moved to administration, part-time, moved to non-tenure-track); joiners by kind (new, returned after years with no line, back from administration).
Source and years
Budget books; hires after the book from web pages.
Why it matters
Separates real departures from title changes.
How to read it
A returning faculty member is not counted as a new hire.
What it does not show
The book does not say why someone left.

Where: Pay report

Vacant tenure-track lines

Current readingVacant tenure-track lines fell by two-thirds: FY19 66 → FY27 24 ▼ −64% (FY19–FY27)

What it measures
Tenure-track lines the budget book prints as Vacant.
How it is computed
Vacant lines in the core university by year.
Source and years
Budget books FY19–FY27.
Why it matters
Fewer vacant lines with fewer filled lines means positions removed, not filled.
How to read it
Read with filled positions.
What it does not show
The book does not say why a line was removed.

Where: Employees report

Students per tenure-track faculty member

Current readingStudents per tenure-track faculty increased: Fall 21 38.5 → Fall 26 42.9 ▲ +11% (Fall 2021–Fall 2026)

What it measures
Degree-seeking students per filled tenure-track line, and per faculty line of either track.
How it is computed
Fall census degree-seeking headcount ÷ lines filled in the matching fiscal year, Fall 2021–Fall 2026.
Source and years
Fall Census; budget books.
Why it matters
Each tenure-track member serving more students leaves less time for advising and mentoring.
How to read it
Counting non-tenure-track lines too gives the second ratio.
What it does not show
Non-degree students left out.

Where: Employees report

Pay

Faculty pay, raises and actual pay. Salaries per 1.0 FTE; same-people comparisons follow the same people through every year.

Median salary per 1.0 FTE

What it measures
The middle budgeted salary of faculty in a group, scaled to a full-time (1.0 FTE) line.
How it is computed
Budget-book salary ÷ FTE; median, with the average beside it; chair and director years shown but kept out.
Source and years
Budget books.
Why it matters
The median is not pulled up by a few high salaries.
How to read it
Compare tenure-track and non-tenure-track separately.
What it does not show
Budgeted base salary; summer pay and stipends outside the book are not included.

Where: Pay report · College page

Same-people pay, before and after inflation

Current readingTenure-track pay lost purchasing power: −3.8% after inflation +17.6% before inflation (FY22–FY27); Non-tenure-track pay outpaced inflation: +6.8% after inflation +30.6% before inflation (FY22–FY27); $100K+ faculty pay lost purchasing power: −10.7% after inflation +9.2% before inflation (FY22–FY27)

What it measures
Average salary of the same faculty, on the books in every year FY22–FY27, same track, never a chair, director or dean in between.
How it is computed
Average per 1.0 FTE; after inflation with the consumer price index (CPI-U) over the same months.
Source and years
Budget books; US Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI-U.
Why it matters
Removes the effect of people joining and leaving: it shows what happened to the pay of those who stayed.
How to read it
A negative change after inflation means buying power fell.
What it does not show
Promotions are included unless the “without promotion” line is used.

Where: Pay report · Overview, Faculty & Pay tab

Raises and the typical raise

Current readingMost years: no raise: 4 of 7 budget years (FY21–FY27)

What it measures
Each year’s raise for continuing faculty, split into promotion, general university raise, professor incentive award and unlabelled change.
How it is computed
Year-to-year salary of the same person; the median raise of those in the same rank.
Source and years
Budget books; promotion lists.
Why it matters
A median of 0% means most faculty received no raise that year.
How to read it
The chatbot labels every raise by kind.
What it does not show
Budgeted raises; mid-year changes are not seen.

Where: Pay report

Raises by college

Current readingRaises differed by college: +8.2% to +42.1% tenure-track, by college (FY22–FY27)

What it measures
Same-people tenure-track raises by college, FY22–FY27.
How it is computed
Same panel rule as above, by college.
Source and years
Budget books.
Why it matters
Shows where pay kept up and where it did not.
How to read it
† marks groups under five people.
What it does not show
Small groups move with one person.

Where: Faculty salary by college

Departing faculty and new hires

Current readingDeparting faculty earned more than new hires: Left after FY26 $107.7K vs New for FY27 $70.4K (FY26 → FY27)

What it measures
Average pay of tenure-track faculty who left after FY26 against those new in FY27.
How it is computed
FY26 salary of leavers; FY27 salary of new hires (a returning faculty member is not a new hire).
Source and years
Budget books.
Why it matters
Replacing senior faculty with junior hires lowers cost and experience at once.
How to read it
Read with the one-year change.
What it does not show
Rank and field differ between the two groups.

Where: Pay report

Actual pay against budgeted salary

Current readingFaculty were paid above budget: $23.7M net, 2021–2025; Staff were paid above budget: $17.3M net, 2021–2025

What it measures
Calendar-year payroll minus the average of the two budgeted salaries the year straddles.
How it is computed
State payroll records (KansasOpenGov) matched by name.
Source and years
KansasOpenGov payroll 2021–2025; budget books.
Why it matters
Summer teaching, overloads and stipends show up here, not in the budget.
How to read it
The person panel splits the gap into summer, overload and other.
What it does not show
Name matching; a person not confidently matched is shown as unmatched.

Where: Pay report, People

Look up anyone

What it measures
Every budgeted person’s salary, FTE, raise, promotion and actual pay, FY19–FY27.
How it is computed
Budget books and payroll.
Source and years
Budget books; KansasOpenGov.
Why it matters
Public salaries, in one searchable table.
How to read it
Filter by year, college, department, track; click a name for the history.
What it does not show
Budgeted lines only.

Where: Pay report, People

Staff and administration

Non-faculty staff, senior administration and administration pay. NIAR (the research institute) is left out of staff counts unless stated.

Staff and faculty FTE

Current readingStaff grew faster than faculty: FY22 2.34 → FY27 2.47 staff per faculty (FY22–FY27) — Staff and faculty FTE, FY19–FY27

What it measures
Budgeted full-time-equivalent staff (support, professional, administrators) against faculty FTE.
How it is computed
Sum of FTE on named lines, whole university without NIAR.
Source and years
Budget books FY19–FY27.
Why it matters
More staff per faculty member means more of the payroll outside the classroom.
How to read it
Staff per faculty member is the ratio to watch.
What it does not show
Positions, not workload.

Where: Employees report

Senior administration

Current readingSenior administration vs Nebraska: FY21 20 → FY27 37 ▲ +85% Total pay $3.3M → $8.3M (+$5.0M) (FY21–FY27)

What it measures
Named senior positions (president, provost, vice presidents, associate and assistant vice presidents, deans) and their total pay, against Nebraska–Lincoln and Nebraska–Omaha.
How it is computed
The same title rules at each university.
Source and years
Budget books; University of Nebraska budgeted employee files.
Why it matters
Leadership cost and growth compared with neighbours.
How to read it
Counts and total pay together.
What it does not show
Title rules can miss a role named differently.

Where: Employees report · Peers report

Staff paid $100K or more

Current readingStaff paid $100K or more nearly doubled: FY21 89 → FY27 172 ▲ +93% (FY21–FY27); Total pay of $100K+ staff rose: FY22 $14.7M → FY27 $28.8M ▲ +96% (FY22–FY27); More staff than faculty now earn $100K or more: Faculty, FY27 154 vs Staff, FY27 172 FY22: 110 faculty, 93 staff (FY22–FY27)

What it measures
Named non-faculty staff with budgeted salaries of $100K or more, their number and total pay, and the comparison with faculty at that level.
How it is computed
Budget lines, not inflation-adjusted.
Source and years
Budget books.
Why it matters
Growth at the top of staff pay is a common sign of administrative growth.
How to read it
Read with the same-staff pay tiles.
What it does not show
A fixed dollar line rises in real terms as prices rise.

Where: Employees report

Same-staff pay

Current readingStaff pay outpaced inflation: +8.7% after inflation +32.9% before inflation (FY22–FY27); Low-paid staff pay outpaced inflation: +11.3% after inflation +36.2% before inflation (FY22–FY27); $100K+ staff pay outpaced inflation: +9.4% after inflation +33.8% before inflation (FY22–FY27)

What it measures
Average pay of the same full-time staff, FY22–FY27: every pay level, those under $60K, those at $100K or more.
How it is computed
Same-people rule; after inflation with CPI-U.
Source and years
Budget books.
Why it matters
Compares how staff and faculty pay kept up with prices.
How to read it
Compare with the same tenure-track faculty.
What it does not show
Raises, promotions and new duties are not separated.

Where: Employees report

Administration and Instruction pay (Table II)

Current reading$31.73 → $35.51 of administration pay per $100 of Instruction pay (FY22→FY27) — 5 of six administration lines grew faster than Instruction pay, FY22–FY27

What it measures
Salaries and benefits of six administration lines (Academic, Executive, General, Physical Plant, Financial Aid, Student Services administration) against Instruction’s, FY22–FY27.
How it is computed
Table II (Operating Budget Summary by Program) of each budget book, General Use plus Restricted Use; General Administration counted as its offices (unit pages).
Source and years
Budget books FY22–FY27, Table II and unit pages.
Why it matters
Shows whether administration pay grew faster than teaching pay.
How to read it
Each card draws both as an index (FY22 = 100); the home figure is the six lines per $100 of Instruction pay.
What it does not show
Student Services Administration is one unit (the LAS Advising Center); Fiscal Operations is left out (it holds reserves).

Where: Budget report · Overview, Key trends

Money budgeted for vacant positions

Current readingMoney budgeted for vacant positions: FY19 $11.7M → FY27 $12.0M ▲ +3% (FY19–FY27)

What it measures
Dollars budgeted on lines printed as Vacant.
How it is computed
Vacant lines in the core university.
Source and years
Budget books.
Why it matters
Vacant-line money can be spent elsewhere during the year.
How to read it
By kind of position in the analysis.
What it does not show
Budgeted, not spent.

Where: Employees report

Revenue from teaching

What teaching brings in, at the lowest possible rates, against faculty pay. College page, five colleges (Health Professions not included).

Minimum tuition revenue from teaching

Current reading$79.7M across the five colleges in 25-26; $6.5M (Fine Arts) to $31.2M (Liberal Arts & Sciences) in 25-26

What it measures
The least revenue the classes a college, department or person taught could have brought in.
How it is computed
Student credit hours × (resident tuition per credit hour + the college course fee); the graduate rate only for classes numbered 700 and up; team-taught classes split equally.
Source and years
Class schedule; KBOR fee schedules.
Why it matters
Puts teaching volume in dollars, so it can be set beside pay.
How to read it
A floor: out-of-state students, campus fees and program fees would add more.
What it does not show
Not actual collections; independent study and theses not counted.

Where: College page, Key trends · Faculty table and person panel

Credit hours taught by faculty

Current reading48% (Fine Arts) to 88% (Engineering) in 25-26 of credit hours taught by faculty

What it measures
Who teaches the credit hours: tenure-track faculty, non-tenure-track faculty, or instructors not on a faculty line (graduate assistants, adjuncts, staff, part-time lines).
How it is computed
Each class’s credit hours split equally among its instructors, matched to budget lines above 0.50 FTE that year.
Source and years
Class schedule; budget books.
Why it matters
Shows how much teaching depends on instructors outside the faculty.
How to read it
By department in View analysis.
What it does not show
An instructor the budget book does not list counts as not on a faculty line.

Where: College page, Key trends

Faculty salary as a share of minimum revenue

Current reading44% (Barton) to 70% (Engineering) in 25-26 of the minimum revenue

What it measures
Budgeted faculty salary ÷ the minimum tuition revenue of the classes offered.
How it is computed
Salary × FTE of faculty lines above 0.50 FTE.
Source and years
Budget books; the revenue above.
Why it matters
A simple sense of how much of the teaching revenue goes to faculty salaries.
How to read it
Not a cost ratio: salary also pays research and service.
What it does not show
Benefits and other instructors’ pay not included.

Where: College page, Key trends

Faculty salary per credit hour taught

Current reading$191 (Barton) to $440 (Fine Arts) in 25-26, against resident undergraduate tuition of $259.75 per credit hour

What it measures
Budgeted faculty salary ÷ the student credit hours faculty taught, beside the tuition a student pays per credit hour.
How it is computed
As above.
Source and years
Budget books; class schedule; KBOR fee schedules.
Why it matters
Compares what a credit hour of faculty teaching costs in salary with what it brings in.
How to read it
Overstates the teaching cost: the whole salary is divided by teaching.
What it does not show
Benefits not counted.

Where: College page, Key trends

Comparisons with other universities

Wichita State against the other Kansas state universities, its federal peer groups and the Nebraska campuses.

Kansas state universities (KBOR Data Book)

Current readingInstruction spending per student grew the least of the six: +4.5% 6th of 6; Administration per $100 of instruction: about double the typical university: $50.91 2nd of 6

What it measures
Wichita State against Kansas, Kansas State, Emporia State, Pittsburg State and Fort Hays State on the same definitions: instruction, administration and pay, staffing, tuition and students.
How it is computed
Figures printed in the Board of Regents’ State University Data Book; shares, ranks and medians computed from them.
Source and years
KBOR State University Data Book, 2018–2026 editions.
Why it matters
The same definitions for all six universities.
How to read it
Rank 1 = highest; the median is of the other five.
What it does not show
KU excludes the Medical Center, K-State excludes Vet Med and Extension; each university codes its own programs.

Where: KBOR stats

Federal peer groups (IPEDS)

Current readingInstruction’s share of spending is below the KBOR peers: FY2018 36.5% → FY2024 35.0% KBOR peers 42.1% → 37.0% (FY2018–FY2024); Faculty pay is below the KBOR peers at every rank: 2018-19 $71.3K → 2024-25 $83.4K KBOR peers $81.6K → $87.9K (2018-19 to 2024-25)

What it measures
Wichita State against its five KBOR-assigned peers, five aspirational peers and regional universities: spending shares, spending per student, faculty pay, staffing, tenure-line share, tuition.
How it is computed
US Department of Education IPEDS complete data files, 2018–2024; medians of each group.
Source and years
IPEDS (nces.ed.gov).
Why it matters
The national standard for comparing universities.
How to read it
Explore every metric on the IPEDS page; groups are listed there.
What it does not show
IPEDS counts the whole university with NIAR and allocates plant costs to functions, so it differs from the budget books.

Where: IPEDS peers · Overview, Peers tab

Nebraska–Omaha and Nebraska–Lincoln

Current readingPay trails Nebraska–Omaha: Assistant −13% Associate −7% Full −3% (FY27)

What it measures
Average faculty pay by rank against Nebraska–Omaha, same-person raises against both Nebraska campuses, and senior administration over time.
How it is computed
University of Nebraska budgeted employee files, FY21–FY27, with the same rules as Wichita State.
Source and years
University of Nebraska budget-salary files.
Why it matters
Nebraska–Omaha is Wichita State’s closest urban-research peer with public salary files.
How to read it
Business and Education are also shown by field.
What it does not show
Rank titles and fields are matched by rule.

Where: Peers report · WSU vs. Nebraska–Omaha

Rules used across the site

Decisions applied the same way on every page, the chatbot and the audit.

Who counts as faculty

What it measures
A budget line above 0.50 FTE with a faculty rank. Salaries are shown per 1.0 FTE with the fraction beside them. Department chairs and school directors are faculty at their rank; their chair or director years are shown but kept out of averages. Deans and associate/assistant deans are administration.
How it is computed
Applied in the data builders; the same rule on charts, tables and the chatbot.
Source and years
Owner decisions 2026-10-05 to 2026-10-19.
Why it matters
One definition everywhere, so numbers agree.
How to read it
‡ marks a role year in tables.
What it does not show
Titles are parsed by rule; unusual titles are checked by hand.

Departures, payouts and returns

What it measures
Owner-confirmed leavers still printed in the FY27 book are out of FY27 counts and averages (their courses stay). An FY27 line about half of FY26 with no Fall 2026 class is a retirement payout. A person absent for years and back in FY27 is “Returned”, not new.
How it is computed
data/wsu_fy27_departures.json, retirement detection, status rules.
Source and years
Owner; class schedule; web pages.
Why it matters
Counts reflect who is actually teaching.
How to read it
The person panel shows the status.
What it does not show
Web pages lag; names are checked by search before anyone is removed.

NIAR and research

What it measures
NIAR (the National Institute for Aviation Research) is left out of staff, faculty and pay figures; budget figures keep the book’s totals and add a “Without NIAR” view.
How it is computed
Unit and title rules.
Source and years
Budget books.
Why it matters
NIAR’s contract staff would swamp university-wide staff trends.
How to read it
Tabs say “Whole university excl. NIAR”.
What it does not show
IPEDS includes NIAR.

Years and periods

What it measures
Fiscal years (FY27 = July 2026–June 2027) for budgets and pay; academic years (25-26) for classes; fall census for enrollment; calendar years for payroll. Money and students are compared over matched windows (FY23 with Fall 2022). Year menus open on the latest year; a partial year is marked *.
How it is computed
Every tile carries its period badge.
Source and years
All pages.
Why it matters
Comparisons over the same years.
How to read it
FY and AY are never mixed in one figure.
What it does not show
Partial years carry no ratios.

Inflation

What it measures
After-inflation changes use the US consumer price index (CPI-U), over the same months as the comparison.
How it is computed
Change in pay minus change in prices, compounded.
Source and years
US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Why it matters
Shows buying power.
How to read it
Every pay tile shows before and after inflation.
What it does not show
National prices, not Wichita’s.

Data sources

Every figure on the site comes from one of these public documents, 20 in all, grouped by who publishes them. Each page’s Data sources button lists the same, with that page’s own notes.

Documents used, by publisher

What it measures

Wichita State University

  • Annual Operating Budget books, FY18–FY27 · source
    Budget by program and division, Table II salaries by program, Table V units, every named position, salary and FTE, vacant lines (budget, positions, pay, staff, administration)
  • Annual Financial Reports (audited), FY19–FY25 · source
    Actual spending by function and revenue by source
  • Tuition and fee proposals to the Board of Regents, FY22–FY25 · source
    Tuition carry-forward (General Fees Fund) and WSU’s own fee tables
  • Class search (Banner), Spring 2020–Fall 2026 · source
    Classes offered, enrollment, class size, credit hours, delivery mode, instructors and teaching load, minimum tuition revenue
  • Office of Planning and Analysis: Fall Census factbook and 10-year workbook, Fall 2016–Fall 2026 · source
    Degree-seeking enrollment, students per faculty member
  • Office of Planning and Analysis: Institutional and Aspirational Peers, 2022 · source
    The aspirational peer group on the IPEDS page
  • Department faculty web pages and news releases, 2025–2026 · source
    Faculty hired after the FY27 book; departures (checked by search); Fall 2025 enrollment announcement

Kansas Board of Regents (KBOR)

  • Comprehensive tuition and fee schedules, AY2018–AY2027 · source
    Resident tuition per credit hour (undergraduate and graduate), college course fees, program fees, differential tuition
  • State university tuition and fee proposals (Board packets), FY2020, FY2021, FY2026, FY2027 · source
    Tuition carry-forward of all six state universities (Appendix F-2)
  • State University Data Book, 2018–2026 editions · source
    KBOR stats page: spending by function, raises, positions, tuition, enrollment, retention and graduation; KBOR-assigned peers (Table 4.35)

State of Kansas

  • KansasOpenGov, Payroll, All State Employees (Kansas Policy Institute), Calendar 2021–2025 · source
    Actual pay of WSU employees against budgeted salary
  • KanView employee compensation, FY2021–FY2025 · source
    The state record behind KansasOpenGov (reference)

Other universities

  • University of Nebraska system: operating budgets and budgeted employee files (Nebraska–Lincoln, Nebraska–Omaha), FY21–FY27 · source
    Faculty pay by rank, same-person raises and senior administration against Wichita State
  • University of Nebraska at Omaha: enrollment reports, Fall 2025 · source
    Enrollment beside the pay comparison
  • University of Kansas: faculty salary listings, FY26–FY27
    KU salaries for the chatbot’s same-rank comparisons
  • Kansas State University: budget facts and fact cards, FY19–FY26 · source
    Regional comparison of instruction budgets
  • University of Oklahoma: annual operating budget, FY23–FY27 · source
    Regional comparison of instruction budgets
  • Colorado State University: operating budget summaries, FY24–FY27 · source
    Regional comparison of instruction budgets

Federal agencies

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics: IPEDS complete data files, 2018–2024 · source
    IPEDS peers page and the home Peers tab: spending by function, faculty salaries, staff by position, enrollment, retention, tuition, for Wichita State and its peer groups
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: Consumer Price Index (CPI-U), 2021–2026 · source
    Every change in pay after inflation

Collected, not yet used on the site

  • Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education (OSRHE): E&G budget summaries FY2019–FY2025, faculty salaries 2016-17 to 2020-21, tuition and fee rates
  • Missouri Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development: comprehensive fee data FY2016–FY2027 and the 2026 factbook
  • Nebraska Coordinating Commission for Postsecondary Education (CCPE): enrollment workbook
  • Kansas Board of Regents: enrollment reports; University of Kansas operating budgets and executive summaries FY2023–FY2027
How it is computed
Extracted by script, checked against the documents, recomputed by an audit before every release.
Source and years
Each page’s Data sources button lists its own.
Why it matters
Every number can be traced.
How to read it
Use the chatbot to ask where a figure comes from.
What it does not show
Public documents only; nothing confidential.
Home